 |
Research: Research and Explore 47 US Supreme Co... |
|---|
| この情報はストアのものより古い可能性がございます。 | ||||
|
価格 | 850円 | ダウンロード |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ｼﾞｬﾝﾙ | 辞書／辞典／その他 | |||
サイズ | 3.9MB | |||
| 開発者 | CHS Systems | |||
| 順位 |
| |||
| ﾘﾘｰｽ日 | 2011-04-06 18:43:17 | 評価 | 評価が取得できませんでした。 | |
| 互換性 | iOS 以降が必要です。 iPad 対応。 | |||
We have consolidated into one eBook volume 47 United States Supreme Court Landmark cases which have greatly influenced the lives of all Americans. In one place, you have access to all of the most famous case, listed below. In addition, we have aded the ability to extensively research by providing the DuckDuckGo search engine as the default search engine.
• Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)
• BOWERS v. HARDWICK, 478 U.S. 186 (1986)
• Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)
• Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000)
• City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989)
• CRAIG v. BOREN, 429 U.S. 190 (1976)
• Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857)
• Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962)
• FORD v. WAINWRIGHT, 477 U.S. 399 (1986)
• FRONTIERO v. RICHARDSON, 411 U.S. 677 (1973)
• FURMAN v. GEORGIA, 408 U.S. 238 (1972)
• Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824)
• Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
• Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. (2007)
• GRATZ et al. v. BOLLINGER et al. (2003)
• GREGG v. GEORGIA, 428 U.S. 153 (1976)
• Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
• Grutter v. Bollinger (02-241) 539 U.S. 306 (2003)
• Hazelwood School District et al. v. Kuhlmeier et al., 484 U.S. 260 (1988)
• JUREK v. TEXAS, 428 U.S. 262 (1976)
• Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944)
• Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)
• Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
• Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)
• MARTIN v. WILKS, 490 U.S. 755 (1989)
• McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819)
• Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
• NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958)
• New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)
• Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
• Planned Parenthood of Se. Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)
• Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)
• PROFFITT v. FLORIDA, 428 U.S. 242 (1976)
• Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978)
• ROBERTS v. LOUISIANA, 428 U.S. 325 (1976)
• ROBERTS v. LOUISIANA, 431 U.S. 633 (1977)
• Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)
• ROMER v. EVANS, U.S. (1996)
• ROPER, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER v. SIMMONS (2005)
• Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)
• STEELWORKERS v. WEBER, 443 U.S. 193
• Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989)
• Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)
• United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974)
• UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA et al., U.S. (1996)
• WEBSTER v. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES, 492 U.S. 490 (1989)
• WOODSON v. NORTH CAROLINA, 428 U.S. 280 (1976)
These decisions are very readable by everyone and great for anyone interested in learning more about the supreme court, history, or the subject of the case.
LANDMARK DECISION:
A landmark decision is the outcome of a legal case (often thus referred to as a landmark case) that establishes a precedent that either substantially changes the interpretation of the law or that simply establishes new case law on a particular issue. Certain cases within this category are widely known in legal studies and may be reviewed by law students even if they have been overturned by later decisions.
FEATURES:
• Utilizes the DuckDuckGo search engine to provide a powerful research tool
• This eBook has internal links, in both directions, between footnotes and citations within the rulings themselves.
• It remembers multiple bookmarks
• Very fast to open and display.
• Excellent reference material for lawyers, teachers and students.
• Has ability to tele-read at a settable pace so as to avoid use of screen gestures.
• This is a reference work eBook eReader.
You can, alternatively, get some of these cases individually by searching for other applications by "CHS Systems".
更新履歴
Removed Advertising.
• Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)
• BOWERS v. HARDWICK, 478 U.S. 186 (1986)
• Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)
• Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000)
• City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989)
• CRAIG v. BOREN, 429 U.S. 190 (1976)
• Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857)
• Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962)
• FORD v. WAINWRIGHT, 477 U.S. 399 (1986)
• FRONTIERO v. RICHARDSON, 411 U.S. 677 (1973)
• FURMAN v. GEORGIA, 408 U.S. 238 (1972)
• Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824)
• Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
• Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. (2007)
• GRATZ et al. v. BOLLINGER et al. (2003)
• GREGG v. GEORGIA, 428 U.S. 153 (1976)
• Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
• Grutter v. Bollinger (02-241) 539 U.S. 306 (2003)
• Hazelwood School District et al. v. Kuhlmeier et al., 484 U.S. 260 (1988)
• JUREK v. TEXAS, 428 U.S. 262 (1976)
• Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944)
• Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)
• Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
• Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)
• MARTIN v. WILKS, 490 U.S. 755 (1989)
• McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819)
• Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
• NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958)
• New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)
• Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
• Planned Parenthood of Se. Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)
• Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)
• PROFFITT v. FLORIDA, 428 U.S. 242 (1976)
• Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978)
• ROBERTS v. LOUISIANA, 428 U.S. 325 (1976)
• ROBERTS v. LOUISIANA, 431 U.S. 633 (1977)
• Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)
• ROMER v. EVANS, U.S. (1996)
• ROPER, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER v. SIMMONS (2005)
• Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)
• STEELWORKERS v. WEBER, 443 U.S. 193
• Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989)
• Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)
• United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974)
• UNITED STATES v. VIRGINIA et al., U.S. (1996)
• WEBSTER v. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES, 492 U.S. 490 (1989)
• WOODSON v. NORTH CAROLINA, 428 U.S. 280 (1976)
These decisions are very readable by everyone and great for anyone interested in learning more about the supreme court, history, or the subject of the case.
LANDMARK DECISION:
A landmark decision is the outcome of a legal case (often thus referred to as a landmark case) that establishes a precedent that either substantially changes the interpretation of the law or that simply establishes new case law on a particular issue. Certain cases within this category are widely known in legal studies and may be reviewed by law students even if they have been overturned by later decisions.
FEATURES:
• Utilizes the DuckDuckGo search engine to provide a powerful research tool
• This eBook has internal links, in both directions, between footnotes and citations within the rulings themselves.
• It remembers multiple bookmarks
• Very fast to open and display.
• Excellent reference material for lawyers, teachers and students.
• Has ability to tele-read at a settable pace so as to avoid use of screen gestures.
• This is a reference work eBook eReader.
You can, alternatively, get some of these cases individually by searching for other applications by "CHS Systems".
更新履歴
Removed Advertising.
ブログパーツ第二弾を公開しました！ホームページでアプリの順位・価格・周辺ランキングをご紹介頂けます。
ブログパーツ第2弾！
アプリの周辺ランキングを表示するブログパーツです。価格・順位共に自動で最新情報に更新されるのでアプリの状態チェックにも最適です。
ランキング圏外の場合でも周辺ランキングの代わりに説明文を表示にするので安心です。
サンプルが気に入りましたら、下に表示されたHTMLタグをそのままページに貼り付けることでご利用頂けます。ただし、一般公開されているページでご使用頂かないと表示されませんのでご注意ください。
幅200px版
幅320px版
お気に入りのアプリをご紹介頂くためのブログパーツです。アプリの価格や順位表示は毎日自動更新♪
サンプルが気に入りましたら、下に表示されたHTMLタグをそのままページに貼り付けることでご利用頂けます。
※配信を停止させていただく可能性もございますので、タグの改変はご遠慮ください。
Now Loading...
「iPhone & iPad アプリランキング」は、最新かつ詳細なアプリ情報をご紹介しているサイトです。
お探しのアプリに出会えるように様々な切り口でページをご用意しております。
「メニュー」よりぜひアプリ探しにお役立て下さい。
Presents by $$308413110 スマホからのアクセスにはQRコードをご活用ください。 →
Now loading...